Contrast to cities in the developed
world, urban India is a mess. What we see in a typical Indian city are shabby
buildings, congested roads, encroached public spaces, pathetic state of garbage
disposal, and a lot of such woes which we are all experiencing if we happens to
live in any Indian city. Yet millions of young people are migrating from rural
areas to urban India, leaving their farmland behind, in search of economic
opportunities and better life style.
People primarily blame their local
Member of Parliament and MLA s, and many others for this state of affairs.
Media often brings MP s, MLA s , Chief Ministers, when they talk essentially
municipal issues like garbage, condition of roads, slum issues etc. We make
these elected representatives responsible for all the ills because we
essentially don’t know who the real culprit is. Let’s examine the issue in
perspective and see where the real problem lies.
Elected Councillors of our municipal
bodies are mainly rent seeking, career politicians whose roles are limited to
choosing Mayoral candidates. They play a minimal role in administration of
municipalities. Meanwhile whole Municipal administration under the bureaucrat
CEO is mainly concerned about garbage disposal, a few roads, water supply and
sanitation, building permits, registration of births and deaths, a few public
works etc.
Urban administration in developed
countries is much different from what we have in our country. In those places,
an elected Mayor is a very powerful entity, who looks after almost everything
related to that city which includes appointment of Police chief who report
directly to him. He does have the power
to tax, formulate land use pattern, prepare master plans, recruit and dismiss
municipal bureaucracy, Engineers , firemen and all others whom he deemed fit
for smooth functioning of his municipality.
Voters, in return can evaluate
Mayor’s performance very clearly and can put all the blame on him if something
gone wrong and can outvote him if wish so. Many times, Mayors are seen to be
competing with each other for fresh investments and thereby creation of jobs
and new tax revenue. We can recollect how cities and mayors vied for newly
announced campus for Google. Let us recollect the highly visible and
commendable role played by Mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani when 9/11 happened.
In many aspects, these mayors of
capital cities are perhaps second most powerful authorities next only to Prime
Minister/ President. In many countries, mayor post is a stepping stone for
highest political offices of that country.
Contrast to this is the way we see
our Mayors. I am sure that very few people in our country know the name of
mayor of their own city. He or she does have a limited role to play whenever
any key decisions are taken. Most of the decisions and approvals pertaining to
any cities are directly approved and monitored by Chief Minister/ Cabinet
minister himself and are executed by concerned District collectors/ CEO s of
municipality.
First step towards urban renewal in
our country should be about real empowerment of our Mayors who should be a
directly elected one and can appoint officers under him. Mayor should be a
man/woman who should have enough financial resources and managerial bandwidth to
take up every, matters related to urban administration and should have command
over all the authorities and bureaucrat under that geographical area.
Since he is an elected representative
and if sufficiently empowered, he will be having a clear incentive to do things
which are in the larger interest of his city as he will be always interested in
re election. Further like in Developed countries, his political career and
ambitions are directly connected to his Mayoral performance. This is unlike a
bureaucratic Municipal commissioner who does not have any incentive to have a
better administration for the city. Let us keep our MP s, MLA s, away from
Municipal issues and let them concentrate on their legislative role.
Unlike other countries, there is a
reason why Mayors in our country is a powerless entity. During freedom
movement, Indian leaders were getting elected to Municipalities as popular representatives.
Remember, Sardar Patel was the President of Ahmedabad municipality and so was
Jawaharlal Nehru in Allahabad. British government was not ready to give
sufficient powers and authority to these popular leaders and kept real
executive powers with British bureaucrat in the form of CEO s and Governors of
the provinces. After independence, the CM s and Commissioners continued to
exercise these powers. Hence we continue to have the institutional legacy of
British municipal administration. Even
the 73 rd and 74 th amendment couldn’t bring much needed changes.
There is a huge amount of
institutional persistence when we talk about urban governance. Bureaucrats
don’t want to cede any powers to an elected Mayor nor do our ‘All India
Service’ officers want to serve under such commands. Neither the CM s wants to bring any changes
to this status-quo situation. An empowered mayor would be a real political
rival to the incumbent CM. Besides no CM wish to lose control over the these
cities, since much of the discretionary and rent seeking powers for the incumbents
come from the land parcels, necessary approvals, building permits,
infrastructure building etc.
Faster economic growth can happen
only if we can re-imagine our cities as more vibrant, productive, environmental
and people friendly. If we want our
cities to be transformed in that manner, we need to have a complete overhauling
of our municipal administration from what we have today. However, what stops us
from having a modern, accountable and incentive based Municipal administration
is that it will be vehemently resisted by the present day authorities and power
holders, who will be having much to lose.
Great analysis on current political economy of urban governance issue, but more important question will be about required policy nudges. Will it be when urban citizens start seeing city as separate political landscape, not just about land governance OR simply when it is flushed with more funds as it can automatically attract political entrepreneurs.
ReplyDeleteGood analysis and nice suggestions. But strong willpower along with good support of voters will be required. Presently it doesn't seem possible In India. So traditional media and the intellectual class will have to work to prepare public's mentality towards it.
ReplyDeleteHowever, appreciable writing.
Keep writing.